Why polyester t-shirts smell worse than cotton ones after a workout
Have you ever noticed that a polyester T-shirt smells worse than a cotton one after you work out? New University of Alberta research now shows why.
Analysis of various fibres soaked in a solution of simulated sweat showed that cotton and viscose, a semi-synthetic fibre made from natural sources of regenerated cellulose, such as wood and related agricultural products, absorbed – and consequently released – smaller amounts of odour-causing compounds than polyester, nylon and wool.
Rachel McQueen
The key finding from the study explains why some commonly worn fibres are smellier than others when people sweat, says Rachel McQueen, a clothing and textiles scientist in the Faculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences who conducted the research with colleagues from the University of Otago in New Zealand.
“Although we know that polyester is smellier after being worn next to sweaty armpits compared to cotton T-shirts, we haven’t really known why. Now we have a better understanding of how odorants transfer and are selectively absorbed by various fibre types in sweat.”
The study’s method of using simulated liquid sweat also offers an important fresh approach to exploring the issue, she notes.
“Body odours commonly transfer to clothing through liquid sweat, but investigation of odour retention in textiles often neglects this route of exposure in test procedures,” McQueen says, noting that standard scientific methods include examining only how the odour passes through the air to the textile. “If you had a sweaty armpit that never actually touched the shirt you’re wearing, then the fabric wouldn’t get very smelly.
“By studying the transfer of odorants to fabrics using a liquid sweat solution, we were able to give a more realistic insight into how these smell compounds really get into our clothes.”
In the study, the researchers soaked the fibres in the sweat solution for different periods of time and then examined the release of various odour-causing compounds from those fibres using analytical equipment that can detect odorants in the air in real-time – more like the human nose does.
Overall, the study showed that cellulosic fibres took in lesser amounts of the compounds when transferred through the sweat solution than textiles made of wool, nylon, and polyester fibres, which, conversely, initially released higher amounts of the smelly compounds.
McQueen explains that sweat is mostly made up of water and has oily compounds that bacteria transform to form odours. “These oily compounds and odorants in the watery sweat can interact differently with textiles, depending on the fibre chemistry.
“While water-loving cellulosic fibres such as cotton and viscose absorb more of the water from sweat than polyester does, polyester doesn’t want to absorb the water,” McQueen notes. “It’s more oil-loving, and it absorbs more of the odorants, which don’t dissolve in water, and more of the oily compounds, which could also later break down and become smelly.”
The study’s results help explain why clothing made of cellulosic fibres tends to be less smelly than synthetic clothing after being worn.
The research also showed that although nylon and wool initially took in a lot of the odorants from the sweat, they dissipated them more quickly than polyester. After 24 hours, wool and nylon had much lower intensities of the odorants and were more similar to the cellulosic fibres.
“That tells us that while polyester still needs to be washed, for nylon and wool garments, people might be able to freshen them by just airing them out rather than laundering (them) every time.”
Knowing more about why sweat makes some fibres stinkier can help consumers make more informed choices when shopping for their clothing, she says.
“This matters for not just exercise clothing but for our day-to-day wear,” she adds.
“Basically, if you’re concerned about smelly clothes, then keep away from polyester. Even with some of the anti-odour claims on some clothing labels, you might want to be cautious. If the anti-odour property is due to an antimicrobial, it may not be as effective as you think because there’s another mechanism in play, which is all about the fibre chemistry and the interaction with odorants.”
The study’s findings could potentially be useful for textile scientists and manufacturers, perhaps in developing polyester to be more water-loving and less attracted to oily compounds, she adds.
| By Bev Betkowski
This article was submitted by the University of Alberta’s Folio online magazine, a Troy Media Editorial Content Provider Partner.
The opinions expressed by our columnists and contributors are theirs alone and do not inherently or expressly reflect the views of our publication.
© Troy Media
Troy Media is an editorial content provider to media outlets and its own hosted community news outlets across Canada.
